Fast and Furious

Fast and Furious

Market Overview
NPM Private Market Tracker*
~58%YTD
50 largest private names in our Nasdaq Price® data
S&P 500
~+10%YTD
Flat on the week
Nasdaq
~+11%YTD
Down 2% on the week

Chip stocks weigh on the Nasdaq. The Nasdaq took a couple of sharp dips this week, first on Monday and then again on Thursday, driven by negative sentiment around memory/chip stocks. It finished down 2% for the week as of Thursday’s close, but saw fresh weakness from chip stocks on Friday morning as well. With the backdrop of a fresh flare-up in US-Iran tensions and a weak performance from IBM, the S&P was flat on the week as of Thursday’s close. Our NPM Private Market Tracker*, which shows the average price performance of the 50 largest names in our internal Nasdaq Price® data, is up ~58% YTD versus the S&P 500/Nasdaq up ~10%/~11%. (Bloomberg, Wall Street Journal, NPM)

It feels like private capital raising deals are coming fast and furious these days, at least for the names in the spotlight. When we see a company coming to market with a deal, we often find ourselves asking “Didn’t they just raise a round?” or “They need capital again so soon?”

This week, we look into the timing and magnitude of fundraising rounds to see whether companies are, in fact, raising capital in shorter timeframes and with larger valuation step-ups than they have in the past. The data for this report is from PitchBook, a Morningstar company, as of 2Q2026, and reflects median data on a rolling 4-quarter basis.

Our key takeaways are:

  1. 01Raises for companies that are large and/or AI-related are coming at a fast clip, almost as fast as they were during the previous bull market of 2021/2022. This may be because AI can be a capital-intensive business, whether capital is needed to fund compute or to manufacture chips, necessitating rounds in relatively quick succession.
  2. 02Smaller companies or those that aren’t focused on AI are seeing the time between rounds actually extend, possibly because AI companies are taking up all of the oxygen in the room as far as fundraising and investor attention is concerned.
  3. 03The difference is stark for late-stage companies. Large, late-stage companies have seen significant compression in their time between rounds, again likely because of the capital needs of their businesses and excitement around their industry positions and IPO potential. Smaller late-stage companies, many of which might be good businesses that generate cash but are not in the spotlight, are raising less often.
  4. 04We see a similar bifurcation in the magnitude of valuation step-ups for subsequent rounds. Large and/or AI-related companies are now raising rounds at ~2.5x their previous valuation, whereas smaller companies and those that aren’t involved in AI are raising well below 2.0x their previous rounds.

Time between rounds: Larger and AI-related deals are seeing time between rounds compress. The median time between rounds – measured in years and on a rolling 4 quarter basis – for the broader market was ~1.8 years during the first two quarters of 2026 and is actually still higher than the ~1.4 median during the previous bull market of 2021/2022. However, when we separate AI companies from the rest, the difference is clear. The time between rounds for AI-related companies stood at ~1.4 years in the first half of 2025, almost back to where it was in 2021 (~1.3 years). For non-AI companies, the time between rounds is the highest it has been in the last 10 years, at ~2.2 years.

We note that we have not broken this data down by sector beyond AI versus non-AI, but in certain sectors such as defense, many companies have raised more than once in a single year owing to the capital intensity of their businesses (Anduril, Saronic and Shield AI each raised twice over the course of around 12 months).

Median time between rounds, AI vs non-AI companies
Median Time Between Rounds — AI v. Non-AI

We can see a similar trend bifurcating smaller deals (raises <$100 million) and larger deals ($100+ million). Time between rounds for larger raises has compressed almost back to 2021 levels at ~1.2 years. In contrast, time between rounds for smaller raises, especially for smaller late-stage raises, remains relatively high.

Median time between rounds, under versus over $100 million raises
Median Time Between Rounds — <$100m v. $100m+

One contrast that stood out to us sharply was the difference in time between rounds for larger late-stage companies (Series C to D+) and smaller late-stage companies. This might reflect market excitement around the industry dominance and IPO potential of larger late-stage companies such as OpenAI and SpaceX, combined with their need to raise capital at a fast clip, compared with smaller late-stage companies that might be cash flow positive but less eye-catching.

Median time between rounds for late-stage companies, larger versus smaller raises
Time Between Rounds — Larger v. Smaller Late Stage

Inter-round step ups: A similar have/have-not story for large companies and those focused on AI. For the broader market, the magnitude of valuation step-ups for each subsequent round has not reached the 2021/2022 peak, even though it sometimes feels that way based on the headlines. For 1H2026, the average step up was ~2.0x the previous round for the broader market versus as much as ~2.6x in 2021/2022. AI-related names are back to raising rounds at ~2.4x their previous valuation, whereas non-AI names are well under 2.0x.

Magnitude of valuation step-ups, AI vs non-AI companies
Magnitude of Subsequent Raises — AI v. Non-AI

Capital appears to beget more capital for larger companies at the moment, as larger companies are raising rounds at larger step-ups than smaller companies.

Magnitude of valuation step-ups, under versus over $100 million raises
Magnitude of Subsequent Raises — <$100m v. $100m+
02Biggest Movers and Topical Names

Based on our proprietary Nasdaq Price® data, the best performers of the large cap names in the private market thus far in 2026 have been:

Prometheus
+524%
BaseTen Labs
+240%
SambaNova
+238%
Clickhouse
+232%
Cerebras
+188%
Anthropic
+173%
Reflection AI
+170%
SB Technology
+143%
OpenEvidence
+140%
Whoop
+137%

Prometheus’ June raise catapulted it to the top performer of the year: It raised $12 billion at a $41 billion valuation in June (Tech Crunch, 6/11/26), whereas its publicly filed certificates imply a valuation in the low-single digits billions prior to that. BaseTen raised a $1.5 billion Series F in June at an $11/$13 billion dual-tier valuation (company press release, 6/22/26) up from its previous $5 billion Series E valuation (company press release, 1/23/26). SambaNova raised a $1 billion Series F in July at an $11 billion valuation (Reuters 7/8/26), compared with its Series E earlier this year closer to a $2 billion valuation based on its publicly filed certificates.

Based on our proprietary Nasdaq Price® data using weighted averages for each sector, the top performing sectors YTD taking into account the top 100 largest names are AI and Machine Learning (97%), Consumer (+76%) and Industrials (+54%). Prometheus’ valuation jump has provided even more juice to AI and Machine learning after Anthropic and Cerebras.

YTD return by sector, weighted average (%)
AI & Machine Learning
+97.4%
Consumer
+76%
Industrials
+54.3%
Healthcare & Life Sciences
+46.3%
Enterprise Software
+30.6%
FinTech
+26.1%
Cybersecurity
−4%
Media & Entertainment
−5.4%
Commerce & Marketplaces
−8.7%
Mobility & Transportation
−12.2%
Climate & Sustainability
−18.8%
Web3 & Digital Assets
−22.2%
03Recent Events
  1. 01
    TSMC is planning to invest another $100 billion in the USA. The Information · 7/16
  2. 02
    Samsung electronics plans to begin operating its first chipmaking plant in Yongin by 2029. The Information · 7/13
  3. 03
    Apple sued OpenAI, alleging it stole hardware trade secrets. PitchBook · 7/13
  4. 04
    Stripe and Advent International have made a joint offer to buy PayPal at a valuation of over $53 billion. Wall Street Journal · 7/15
  5. 05
    Uber agreed to acquire Germany’s Delivery Hero for around $14 billion. The Information · 7/16
  6. 06
    SpaceX shares fell below their June IPO price of $135. Bloomberg · 7/15
  7. 07
    IBM shares suffered their biggest drop in history (~25%) after the company reported weakness in its infrastructure arm. Wall Street Journal · 7/14
  8. 08
    New York became the first state to enact a data center moratorium, pausing environmental permits for up to one year for large-scale data centers. PitchBook · 7/15
  9. 09
    Meta said it would double its Louisiana data center capacity to 5GW. The Information · 7/14
04Notable Capital Raises
Fireworks, a custom AI training company, raised a $1.5 billion series D at a $17.5 billion valuation. Axios · 7/16
$17.5B val
German drone company Helsing raised a $1.8 billion round at an $18 billion post-money valuation. CNBC · 7/13
$18B val
Neko Health, a Swedish whole-body scan company, raised a $700 million Series C at a $7 billion valuation. Axios · 7/15
$7B val
Nous Research, which develops open-source AI agents and language models, is reportedly finalizing a $75+ million round at a $1.5 billion valuation. StrictlyVC · 7/13
$1.5B val
China’s DeepSeek is seeking to raise $1.5 billion at a $71 billion valuation. Axios · 7/15
$71B val
Astro Mechanica, which develops turboelectric supersonic jet engines, is planning to raise a $250 million Series B. Axios · 7/16
$250M
AI drug discovery company Chai Discovery raised $400 million at a $3.8 billion valuation. Axios · 7/14
$3.8B val
05Notable Exits
CSquare, a Texas data center operator backed by Brookfield, raised $1.1 billion in an IPO. Axios · 7/16
$1.1B IPO
Standard Nuclear, a maker of fuel for small modular reactors, raised $150 million in an IPO. Axios · 7/16
$150M IPO
Holtec Nuclear, a New Jersey-based nuclear company, filed for an IPO. Axios · 7/13
IPO planned
Online fashion retailer Shein received Chinese regulatory approval to list in Hong Kong. The Information · 7/13
HK listing

Disclaimer
This commentary is not a recommendation, offer, solicitation of an offer, or advice to buy or sell securities by Nasdaq Private Market, LLC, NPM Securities LLC, SecondMarket Financial LLC, or any of its affiliates (collectively, “NPM”). Securities related services are offered through NPM Securities, LLC (“NPMS”), member of FINRA/SIPC. SecondMarket Financial, LLC (“SMF”) is an SEC-registered investment adviser.

The information should not be taken as tax, investment, legal or other advice, nor should it to be relied upon in making a decision to buy or sell. You should obtain relevant and specific professional advice before making any trade decisions. Registered representatives at NPMS do not provide guidance on the benefits of any specific investment or help with determining the fair market value of securities.

All trademarks are the property of their respective owner(s). “Tape D” and “SecondMarket” are registered trademarks of NPM. Unless expressly stated otherwise, companies listed on this site are not sponsoring, endorsing, or otherwise affiliated with, Nasdaq Private Market, LLC, and none of the statements on this website should be attributed to a listed company.